SITUATION
AND DECISION BRIEFING
A
Implement
World-Wide Free EM Energy from the Active Vacuum
T. E. Bearden
INTRODUCTION
AND SUMMARY
The Overall
Situation
We assume
the recipient is aware of (a) the
increasing energy crisis and global warming today, (b) the various proposals to
address the energy problem and the severe shortcomings of each, and (c) the
fact that all present proposals are at best stop-gap measures simply postponing
world disaster and not yielding any real solution.
As Al Gore incisively stated
in July 2008, "The survival of the
We also
strongly support Gore's statement in latter 2007 that “What we are going to have to put in place is a combination of the
We add the
specific direction that the solution must take: We must quickly achieve and implement practical new "energy
from the vacuum" electric power systems that act as "EM
windmills" freely receiving and using EM energy from the ceaseless and
inexhaustible "EM energy winds" of the modern interacting vacuum.
Energy from the vacuum is the
easiest thing in the universe to evoke. Every charge or dipole in the universe
continuously pours out a real "free EM energy wind" extracted from
its vacuum interaction. It will do so as long as the charge or dipole exists¾even till the end of time.
The only
problem is in building a proper "windmill system" to sit in that free
EM energy wind, diverge and collect some of the energy, and then use this
freely collected EM energy to power our loads. The pundits say this cannot be
done. It can.
In 2007, Astronaut Brian
O'Leary's open letter to Al Gore in 2007 pointed out the problem with most
organized science of today, when he stated “…don't
rely exclusively on those mainstream scientists, journalists and pundits who
deny the reality of new energy. They are just as ignorant as those scientists
who denied the practicality of aviation even after the Wright brothers were
flying. But to expect the Wrights to immediately deliver a 737 would have been
unrealistic.”
Ignored Aspects
Of The Situation
Energy and Work Are Misunderstood. We
strongly stress Nobelist Feynman's admonition to our scientists, in his three
volumes of physics in 1964, that "It
is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what
energy is." {[1]}
As pointed out so strongly by
the Physics Teacher, {[2]}
energy is not the capacity to
do work. We add that, instead, the change of form of energy is the rigorous
definition of "work". And, after the work (change of form of the
energy) is done, one still has the energy
remaining in the changed form, since energy can neither be created nor
destroyed. Indeed, the energy in its new form can even be used to do additional
free work, if it still remains in the system and under its control! There is no conservation of work law;
only a conservation of energy law.
All EM Energy Comes Freely From the Seething
Vacuum. Oddly, since 1957 and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee
and Yang, we have known that all EM energy flowing in every EM field and
potential in every EM system comes
freely from the virtual state vacuum. This is via the proven broken symmetry of the source dipole (and of the source
charge and its polarized vacuum charge of opposite sign). Every joule of EM
energy in this universe comes or has come from the vacuum in that exact manner.
Nobelist
Lee succinctly pointed out, e.g., that when we have a broken symmetry,
something formerly virtual becomes observable {[3]}.
Van
Flandern gives us a beautiful analogy of a "static" EM field being
made of finer parts in continuous steady motion. Quoting: “To retain causality, we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the
term ‘static’. One meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The
other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all
moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of a waterfall. A
frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is
static in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet
the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of
entities that propagate. …So are … fields for a rigid, stationary source frozen,
or are they continually regenerated? Causality seems to require the latter.”
{[4]}.
The
Universe Is Filled With "Free EM Energy" Sources. Every charge and every dipole {[5]}
is thus a free source of an endless outpouring of real observable, usable EM
energy. The energy is freely absorbed as virtual photons from the seething
virtual state vacuum and integrated coherently to quantum size¾then re-emitted as the steady
stream of real, observable EM energy comprising the so-called
"static" EM fields associated with the charge or dipole.
There is no
problem in producing all the free "EM energy flow from the active
vacuum" that one wishes, anywhere, anytime. Just gather together some
charge or form a dipole. "Free EM
energy winds" are easily evoked and will flow forever, so long as we
simply leave the source charges or dipoles intact and do not destroy them.
Further, in modern physics the
"simple source charge"¾such as a single electron¾is actually comprised of two
infinite charges, {[6]}
each having infinite energy. There is an infinite "bare" charge in
the middle, having infinite energy, surrounded by an infinite charge (also
having infinite energy) in the surrounding polarized vacuum medium. However,
the difference between these
two infinite charges is finite¾and is the standard "classical" value of the
charge printed in the textbooks and "measured" by our instruments
peering through the infinite screening charge at the infinite internal bare
charge and "seeing" only the "finite difference".
Hence any
classical charge or classical dipole can and will pour out a steady and
unending finite flow of EM energy for any finite length of time. And so it does¾producing and continually
replenishing what are known classically as the "static fields" of the
source charge or dipole.
There is no "energy"
availability problem! There is no problem at all in evoking very
powerful and continuous free flows of EM energy, anywhere in the universe,
anytime, very cheaply and easily. Every charge and dipole in the universe is
already doing it, has always done it, and will continue doing it until the end
of time, if the charge or dipole is not destroyed.
We point
out immediately that, since all our EM circuits and systems have a source
dipole, then something very odd and bizarre in every circuit or system must be
destroying that source dipole all the time. Else every EM dipolar circuit and
system would already be a "never-ending free EM energy from the
vacuum" system. In short, our own
electrical engineers and scientists are building something into every EM system
that deliberately and continually destroys its source dipole. We will
return to that point.
The only
problem, then, is to build the proper "EM windmill", completely disconnected from the
"source of the EM energy wind" (the source dipole), that will
intercept and catch some of the freely flowing EM wind energy, then separately
dissipate that collected EM energy in the loads to separately power them.
Insight
From Group Theory. As two Nobelists have told us, the most
penetrating insight we can have into equations (models) and physical systems is
in terms of group theory. Quoting: "It
is increasingly clear that the symmetry group of nature is the deepest thing
that we understand about nature today." {[7]}
Applying such
penetrating group theory insight, we recognize that such a proper "EM
windmill" system is a priori an asymmetric EM system. And we
discover to our horror that the deliberately truncated electrical engineering
model used by all our electrical engineers contains only symmetrical EM systems!
Crippling of Electrical
Engineering and Electrical Power Systems. In 1892, Lorentz was elicited
to symmetrize the already-truncated
Heaviside equations, {[8]} so that the resulting crippled
Heaviside-Lorentz equations¾thereafter used as the standard electrical engineering model¾would be used in the new
electrical engineering from its very birth. This was done specifically upon orders from J. P. Morgan to
guarantee that none of the confounded "Tesla systems freely taking and
using EM energy from the active medium" would ever be developed by this
future electrical engineering. {[9]}
Electrical Engineering Crippled Since
Birth. Since the very birth
of electrical engineering, the world's electrical engineers have thought, designed,
developed, and implemented only symmetrical
electrical power systems. They have been totally unable to think or build such
a required "proper EM windmill" to tap the ubiquitous free flows of
energy. They fail to take
advantage of the fact that every joule of EM energy in the universe is freely
received as a free EM energy output flow from the seething vacuum's interaction
with our source charges and source dipoles, where the output flow is emitted as
real EM energy (real photons) pouring freely from those charges and dipoles.
This is the
reason all our engineers and scientists are so convinced that¾except for a few areas such as
wind energy, solar cell energy, hydroturbine power, etc.¾to obtain EM energy they must
consume fuel. They have been totally concerned only with symmetrical EM systems. And so they have never even learned
to build a proper asymmetrical
"EM energy flow windmill system" to easily tap the incredible numbers
of free EM energy wind flows spewing from every charge and dipole in the universe.
Maxwell's Theory Includes Asymmetric Systems. Such
asymmetric "windmill" systems do occur widely in Maxwell's original
theory, though not in the mutilated subset in electrical engineering. Tesla¾who gave us AC power, the
rotating magnetic field that makes modern generators possible, radio, robotics,
and many other advances¾also had discovered asymmetric Maxwellian circuits and
systems. He was hell-bent on giving the world free EM energy, based on his
"asymmetric circuit" discoveries. Quoting Tesla:
"Ere many generations pass, our
machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe.
This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who
derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one
of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this
energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic¾and this we
know it is, for certain¾then it is a
mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the
very wheelwork of nature." {[10]}.
“Electric power is everywhere present
in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of
coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels."
“We have to evolve means for obtaining
energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do
not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that
the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development
I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth
by the energy of the medium...” {[11]}.
"Whatever our resources of
primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without
consumption of any material." {[12]}
Tesla later
also showed his total disdain for the horribly flawed old Heaviside-Lorentz
theory (then known generally as the "Hertz" theory). Quoting Tesla:
"The Hertz wave theory of
wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say
that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and
inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in
history." {[13]}
The Suppression of Tesla. To prevent his development and delivery of
free "energy from the active medium" systems, Tesla was trapped and
eventually destroyed by Morgan, as was Tesla's backer, Westinghouse. Meanwhile,
in 1892, Morgan's scientific advisors elicited Lorentz to "fix" the
new Heaviside equations just being prepared for introduction into universities
to give birth to what was to be called "electrical engineering." {9}
Tesla Was Not a Crackpot. Well,
was Tesla just a "nut" and totally deluded? Absolutely not! As an
example, Barrett {[14]}
has rigorously shown that EM expressed in quaternions (a higher group symmetry
algebra) allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also
allows additional EM functioning of Tesla's circuits that a conventional EM analysis
cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this
"energy shuttling", and that Tesla could thus asymmetrically dissipate his shuttled potential energy where and as
he wished. We stress that Barrett is a renowned higher group symmetry
electrodynamicist and one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar.
Conclusion:
Science Unwittingly Causes The Present Energy Crisis
Three Major Erroneous Omissions Were Arbitrarily
Made. So, eerily, the steady movement of symmetric-EM-systems-only
electric-powered civilization toward the present world energy crisis and its
associated global warming crisis was actually implemented and maintained by
science itself in several severely restrictive and arbitrary actions in 1892 {8}, 1900 {[15]}, and 1934 {[16]} specifically. These restrictions
simply discarded all possible
EM systems taking their energy freely from the "active medium" and
using it to freely power the loads. Those
arbitrary restrictions are still applied and upheld in our electrical
engineering technology and by the conventional scientific community as an iron
dogma.
In 1892 Lorentz Arbitrarily Symmetrized the
Heaviside Equations. As stated, this arbitrarily discarded
all the asymmetric "free energy from the vacuum" Maxwellian systems.
M. W. Evans et al. {[17]}
give rigorous proof that eliminating the arbitrary
1892 Lorentz symmetry condition does provide asymmetric EM systems having free
additional energy currents from the vacuum, for use in powering loads.
In 1900 Lorentz Also Taught Scientists to
Discard the Giant Curled Heaviside Component of the EM Energy Flow From Every
Generator Or Primary Source. In 1900 Lorentz was further elicited
to condition the professors and electrical engineers to universally and blithely
eliminate Heaviside's astounding discovery that every generator already
extracts from the vacuum and emits trillions of times as much EM energy as the
mechanical energy we crank into its shaft to keep restoring the source dipole. Lorentz
taught them a simple little surface integration trick that rids one of the
troublesome divergence-free curled component. {15}. He justified it by proclaiming that this giant
curled flow "has no physical significance".
The same
claim is still repeated by classical electrodynamicists and electrical
engineering. E.g., quoting
Obtaining Energy From the Giant Curled Heaviside
Energy Flow Component. In the well-known optical NRAM
(negative resonance absorption of the medium) systems and effects, the GR
section absorbs input energy and then re-emits some 18 times as much Poynting
energy flow as was input. This "excess emission" is well-established,
but the physicists are forced to use the phrase "negative absorption"
and never to use the phrase "excess emission". They are also not
allowed to consider the gigantic uncurled Heaviside energy flow component that
was also input to the GR section. And of course they are not allowed to discuss
the thermodynamics of NRAM.
But this
self-resonating GR section will also convert a small bit of the input giant
curled Heaviside energy flow to diverged
(Poynting) energy flow, thus producing the excess emission (euphemistically
called "negative absorption").
The self-resonating charged particles
in the GR section absorbing the normal input EM energy flow will thus output some 18 times as much
diverged EM energy emission (Poynting EM energy flow) as was in the Poynting EM
energy flow component that was input
to the GR section {[19]}.
But to preserve their scientific standing and reputations (and get their papers
published), the optical physicists are never allowed to say "excess
emission", but must use the mind-numbing phrase "negative
absorption". And they are not allowed to say "COP = 18" or
"COP = 1800%", but must say that "the reaction cross section is
increased 18-fold".
This giant
Heaviside energy flow¾accompanying the feeble Poynting
diverged energy flow component in every circuit and system¾is in peculiar
"curled" form. Hence normally (i.e., in any special relativity situation), it does not diverge into the
circuit, and so it usually just escapes and does nothing at all. We will be
proposing an application of the known but concealed general relativity NRAM situation that does allow divergence
and use of some of that available giant Heaviside curled EM energy flow: We
will use it to propose self-powering
steam generators by an appropriate clamped positive feedback NRAM
system modification of the present steam generators in almost all our present
electrical power systems.
Once the
NRAM-modified steam boiler is up and running, clamped positive feedback is
switched in for self-powering. Thereafter the primary power plant can be shut
down and is no longer needed. A single "jump-started" self-powering
steam generator can then use part of its output power to "jump-start"
additional self-powering steam boilers¾as
many as needed.
Frightened
Physicists Largely Ripped Negative Energy From Physics. In
1934, a thoroughly frightened physics leadership (including, e.g., Heisenberg
and Pauli) strongly and deliberately forced the inappropriate removal of
negative energy from Dirac's theory. This was a horrible mistake, crippling all
of physics from then on.
As Hotson
pointed out, “...if one had to point to a single place where science went
profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation
of Dirac’s equation.” {16}
If the negative energy of the local
vacuum is not arbitrarily removed, the statistical operations underlying
any and all observable physics entities (and thus continually creating and
sustaining observed physical reality itself) can be directly engineered
at will, by judicious use of both positive and negative vacuum energy and the
resulting positive and negative probabilities.
In modern physics, anything in our
observed physical reality actually is continually being created and sustained
by its underlying statistical operations and probabilities, all the way
"up" in size from the virtual state "bubbling" vacuum. The
virtual vacuum is not an "emptiness" filled with bubbles;
instead, it is just the bubbles, where those continually interacting
with positive energy with each other do produce higher and higher realities¾ until the
quantum threshold is crossed and observable reality particles and structures
and forces are generated.
Use of Negative Energy and Negative
Probabilities. By judicious use of both positive and negative underlying
statistical probabilities, one then can directly engineer physical reality
itself. One can not only cause
an observable thing to "happen" and "continually be there"
because of positive energy of the vacuum and positive probabilities, but with
negative energy of the "tickled vacuum" he can also cause such an observable thing to
"unhappen" and just vanish, and then continually "be
absent". He simply (and deliberately) changes the energy and probabilities
of the underlying statistical operations that create and sustain physical
reality structures themselves.
Negative
energy for activating these negative probabilities can easily be added to a
local vacuum in a specific region by simply "tickling" the local
Dirac Sea with sharp little low-energy pulses throughout that region {[20]}.
This pops out electrons, leaving behind Dirac holes. These Dirac holes are
actually negative mass-energy electrons (or dark matter) that¾as source charges¾continually emit negative energy
photons which continually forms and replenishes their associated negative
energy fields (dark energy).
Instead of peering through his
telescope and fervently seeking distant dark matter and dark energy, the
astrophysicist can readily produce both dark matter and dark energy on the
laboratory bench and investigate their phenomenology. Bedini, e.g., has been
producing and using dark matter and dark energy in his revolutionary battery
charging systems and electrical power systems for 25 years.
By removing
those arbitrary and self-imposed scientific restrictions {8}{15}{16}, the energy crisis and associated global warming do
have a very unexpected solution—systems
that freely receive and use EM energy from the vacuum, and which are practical,
relatively inexpensive, quick, and permanent.
By the
judicious re-addition of negative energy to the local active vacuum, the negative
energy vacuum will also "unhappen" the water molecule's O-H bond, so
that the water molecules fall apart into H2 and O2
bubbles, as in the independently tested and proven Kanzius watergas process {[21]}.
Such an
additional negative energy "froth" added into the local vacuum can
also "unhappen" a specific disease condition, as is also being
independently proven for Kanzius' new cancer cure process {[22]}.
With further progress, eventually
scientists should be able to cure most debilitating diseases¾simply,
easily, cheaply, and quickly.
The
transition to the deliberate use of negative energy (and negative
probabilities) of the local vacuum interaction requires a dramatic change of
the presently enforced
"positive Dirac energy only" scientific paradigm¾which simply ignores the
negative solution that was present in modern physics before being mostly
removed. Dean Dan Solomon, e.g., has published very important papers strongly
showing that negative energy cannot be logically removed from physics {[23]}.
Solving the Energy
Crisis Is a Physics Problem. From the above discussions, we
strongly point out that the solution to the world energy crisis is a physics
solution and it is not present at all in present electrical engineering (EE).
The sad old mutilated EE model was glued together in the 1880s and then it was
deliberately and horribly crippled in 1892 and 1900, before most of modern
physics was even born. With the removal of negative energy from Dirac physics
in 1934, the suppression was complete.
Since
the highly defective electrical engineering model has no active vacuum included
in it, obviously it cannot model or design EM systems that do freely
take and use EM energy from the vacuum to freely power their loads. Or
"unhappen" water molecule O-H bonds. Or "unhappen" cancer
and other debilitating disease conditions.
All EM systems do already take all their
EM energy directly from the vacuum via the broken symmetry of the source
dipole. So obviously electrical engineering is horribly fouled, since
it does not correctly model where its own EM energy comes from or how. Electrical engineering does not even
teach how an EM circuit or system is actually powered, and it has never done
so!
Such is not
included in the EE model itself, and today no practicing electrical engineer
actually knows how his external circuit is potentialized and
"powered"¾or the
real reason why he has to keep cranking the shaft of the generator.
Modern
physics, however, does include the active virtual state vacuum which continually
interacts with every charge and dipole and which participates in generating
every force including all EM forces.
Also,
modern physics already includes higher
group symmetry electrodynamics models which (a) are not electrical
engineering but way beyond it, and (b) do model the active vacuum and its
interaction with charged matter. Hence it is such "higher group symmetry
electrodynamics" wherein physics already has the necessary answer to the
world energy crisis! It's there; it
just requires "putting together" and doing.
Higher Group Symmetry
Electrodynamics Must Be Applied. The higher group symmetry
electrodynamics answer to the energy crisis has not been pursued or applied
because of (a) the accepted physics practice of rather totally ignoring the
"crude old electric power" as being beneath the dignity of the
physicists themselves, and (b) the conviction of the electrical engineers that
their horribly flawed model is actually "perfect" and infallible.
As an example, the response to this
author from the National Science Foundation's top electrical staff in control
of electric power, communications, etc. was that there was nothing at all wrong
with the EE model; after all, your TV set works, doesn't it? This was after the
NSF itself (including NSF physicists in the review) had just reviewed {[24]}
and passed a paper {[25]}
listing the falsities contained in the standard electrical engineering model,
falsities long pointed out by Nobelists and eminent scientists!
Our answer to the NSF electrical
staff, of course, is that our TV set works only as long as we continually pay
to restore its source dipole that the silly arbitrarily-symmetrized EE system¾promulgated by
that very NSF electrical staff¾continually "kills". It is incredibly shortsighted
to continue to build only those EM systems which do continually use half their
freely collected "energy from the vacuum" to kill their internal
source of free energy from the vacuum, so that we then have consume fuel
etc. to pay for continually restoring that source dipole.
We do not consume all that fuel
and pay all that money for the energy to power the loads. Instead, we do
it to keep restoring the source dipole that a very archaic and dogmatic
self-symmetrizing electrical system keeps continually destroying! Once made,
the source dipole freely furnishes the EM energy to power the loads, taking
that energy directly from its interaction with the seething vacuum.
How a Generator and Its External Circuit Are
Powered. Let us examine the input of mechanical shaft energy into a
generator, by paying to crank the shaft. Once the generator starts to rotate,
the input mechanical shaft energy is transduced in form (courtesy of Nikola
Tesla) into rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator. Since change
of form of energy is the rigorous definition of work, then cranking the shaft requires work.
But we
still have the rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator.
So then
what happens to the rotating magnetic field energy?
All of it
is dissipated against the local charges inside
the generator¾forcing
the positive charges in one direction and the negative charges in the other,
and thereby forming the internal source dipole. The rotating magnetic field
energy is dissipated (escapes from the entire generator system) in that
process. None of it pours out of the
generator terminals to power the external circuit.
And that is
all that cranking the shaft of the generator does. It restores or forms the destroyed or being-destroyed source dipole
inside the generator. None of that input energy that we pay to input to
the shaft of the generator, goes into powering the external circuit and the
loads!
Once that
source dipole is formed, it is the internal source's "broken
symmetry". As well-known in physics but totally absent from electrical
engineering, once formed the source dipole's broken symmetry (a) freely absorbs
virtual EM energy from its seething vacuum interaction, (b) integrates the
absorbed subquantal energy to quantal size, and then (c) pours out of the
generator terminals a vast flow of real, quantal, observable, usable EM energy.
This
gigantic energy flow from the terminals is along through space surrounding the
external conductors. The flow is comprised of two components: (a) the tiny
Poynting energy flow that diverges into the external conductors to power up the
electrons, and (b) the gigantic (trillions of times larger) curled Heaviside
energy flow component that is usually not diverged at all, so does not interact
with anything and just roars on off into space and is wasted.
But the
electrical engineer builds his self-symmetrizing system by connecting the
external circuit and its loads in a
closed current loop with the internal source dipole of the generator.
So one-half the freely collected Poynting energy in the external circuit is
then used to force the spent electrons back through the generator's internal
source dipole, against its back electro-motive force (EMF), thus scattering the
separated charges and destroying the dipole.
In a 100%
efficient dipole-restoring process, it will then require as much energy to restore the dipole charge separation as
was used to destroy it. If the process is less than 100% efficient (i.e., has
losses), it will require more
energy to restore the source dipole that was used to destroy it.
The other
half of the free "energy from the vacuum" collected in the external
circuit is dissipated in the loads and losses of that circuit, in the forward
EMF region. This means that less than
half the free energy collected in the external circuit is used to power the
loads.
So to
restore the source dipole inside the generator, and thus keep the free
energy-from-the-vacuum flowing out of the generator terminals so that it will
keep powering the loads, we have to
keep cranking the shaft of the generator with more mechanical energy than is in
the useful output energy doing work in our loads.
We strongly
iterate that we do not crank the shaft of the generator to directly power the
loads! It is necessary in order to restore
the internal source dipole, that the EE self-symmetrizing circuit is foolishly
built to continue to destroy!
And because
of the way the symmetrizing circuit is built, it will always require more
energy to continually restore the dipole than the system delivers to effectively
power the loads.
Thus we pay
our electrical engineers to always design self-symmetrizing electrical power
circuits that (a) deliberately engage in a giant wrestling match inside their
own generators, and (2) always lose!
The huge and continuing consumption
of the dirty fuel and the despoiling of our biosphere is because of the totally
inane type of systems our electrical engineers are taught to build, and that
our "attention elsewhere" physics community blithely ignores!
Our Scientific Blindness
Has Caused the Energy Crisis. In summary, the real and totally
unsuspected cause of the rapidly escalating world energy crisis is indeed the
1892 and 1900 crippling of the old electrical engineering model itself and the
ubiquitous use of this horribly mutilated model¾for all our
electrical power systems¾for more than a
century. The scientific community is flatly to blame for it! And we can no
longer continue to ignore such scientific blindness and the blithe failure to
recognize the real self-induced problem!
Summarizing
the Problem and Its Solution:
The Situation:
The present
energy paradigm—that one must almost always consume fuel to dirtily provide EM
energy and power—has failed. In our "consume fuel for energy" world,
we are in a serious and escalating world energy crisis because of the peaking
of world fuel supplies and available fuel supply rates, occurring in the face
of increasing populations and increased worldwide demands for energy to enable
a decent standard of living. At the same time we are in an escalating
contamination of the biosphere by increasing fuel wastes and related harmful
byproducts, leading toward poisoning of our planet and rapidly increasing
global warming and drastic climatic change.
Since science and engineering are
directly responsible for the mutilated electrical engineering model and
practice responsible for this crisis, then the scientific community has to be
forcibly ordered by the political community to solve the EE problem!
Impending
Results:
The results
now looming are (a) catastrophic collapse of world economies and monetary
systems, (b) rapidly increasing world food shortages, hunger, and starvation,
(c) dramatic and harmful climatic change, melting of polar icecaps (for the
arctic, perhaps as early as 2012), and global heating, and (d) inevitable wars
and mass destructions unleashed between harshly competing nations of the world.
"Solutions"
That Are Not Solutions:
Presently
all officially proposed "solutions" are slow, very expensive, very
difficult, mostly serving vested interests, mostly still climatically
"dirty" or environment-despoiling, and at best temporary. Most rely on essentially the same
"consumption of fuel" energy systems we presently know and utilize,
with important but minor increased contributions by wind power, solar power,
etc.
More of the same things that gave us this
severe crisis in the first place will not solve it. Thus the world crisis
escalates toward meltdown.
Special
Characteristics of the Situation and of the Required Solution:
The Cause of the Energy Crisis Cannot Be Used
for Its Solution. If "consumption of fuel to
obtain needed energy" is the primary problem, then obviously the startling
solution must somehow provide all the energy we need, without consuming fuel!
Solar power, wind power, and hydroelectric power are stop-gap measures, but
they will not solve the problem. Too bulky, too expensive, not dependable, etc.
The
Solution Must be Clear and Effective. A new and novel solution to
the entire energy problem is absolutely essential. It must be quick, cheap, relatively
easy, very clean, and permanent. Its validity must
already be clearly proven scientifically, even though presently unrecognized
for engineering purposes. Further, a clear explanation as to why it has eluded
recognition by our scientific community for more than 100 years must also be
forthcoming. We have given a short overview of it in this paper.
We Must
Capitalize on the Sunk Costs of the Power Grid System. As a single example of the present
situation, the
Worldwide there is a century
of investment in the present totally inadequate electric power structures,
grids, and systems. Since the financial cost for quick grid system replacement
is quite astronomical and unaffordable, the grid must be cleanly and cheaply
“altered” in a revolutionary new break-through manner. It must still be used
for a 20-to-40 year period—but with the power plants consuming only very little
if any fuel—while almost immediately and massively furnishing free EM energy directly from the
vacuum as its primary function.
The
Problem Is Overwhelmingly Serious. As another example of the
criticality of the problem, a typical
The Solution
Must Apply to Centralization and to Decentralization.
Hence the new solution must be adaptable for both great centralization and
nearly total decentralization of electric power. It must be usable for
initiating the self-powering of the huge
In short,
the grid must not stop, the big trucks must not stop, local power to and in the
cities must not stop, and the daily food delivery must not stop. Else the
entire system will convulse and quickly flush itself and the economy right down
the tube.
The Solution Must Be Highly Innovative. We
have pointed out the use of self-powering steam boilers¾once developed¾to reduce a giant wind farm
requirement to a requirement for a single windmill, to reduce a giant solar
power generator array to a far smaller single "jump-starting" array,
etc.
Another
example of the innovation required can be taken from a new development in solar
cells deliberately made near molecular size. According to NewScientist,
Victor Klimov and his team in Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico have
constructed a solar cell which can absorb the light of a specific wave length
in a special way, such that one photon can cause energization of more than one
electron {[26]}
{[27]}.
As soon as the electron absorbs a photon, it disappears for a very short moment
into the quantum field.
Being in
the virtual state the electron can borrow energy from the vacuum and thereafter
appears again in our reality. Now the electron can energize up to 7 other
electrons, as found by the Klimov team and directly stated by them. This leads
to a theoretical coefficient of performance of 700%.
A COP =
200% can be readily achieved and has
been. The experiment has also been replicated successfully by the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden Colorado.
We point
out that, at about COP = 300%, one can conceivably add clamped (controlled)
positive feedback of one of those output electrons and directing it back to the
input, thus replacing the original operator's input. In that case the unit
would become "self-powering" (powered by energy from the vacuum)
while putting out the other two electrons as remaining useful output. Therefore
this new development by Klimov and team points a new, replicated, validated way
to approach self-powering solar power cell generator arrays.
The Solution Must Be Clean. And
also the solution must be clean.
By being fuel-free, it is already carbon-free. By using judicious development
of key self-powering components, one eliminates the use of most of the present
power plants powering grids worldwide. The water-cooling requirements for these
plants thus are dramatically reduced and almost eliminated. One has eliminated
most of the harmful emissions from present power systems, etc. And one is
taking the power directly from an inexhaustible, powerful, and clean source:
the local active vacuum.
Thus the solution
consumes little or no fuel except for initial "jump-starting" the
energy-from-the-vacuum systems. The solution draws its input energy freely from
the ubiquitous active spacetime/vacuum medium, in any amounts needed, and very
simply and easily and cheaply.
As another
example of the high cleanness advantages, the Bedini process for recharging
batteries is epochal and uses negative energy as well as positive energy. His
negative energy process will "unhappen" the normal sulfation etc. of
a battery, dramatically extending its life several-fold while also increasing
the amount of charge it will accept.
The first
Bedini units have already been through Underwriter Laboratory testing, as has
the small production line, and the parent company (Energenx, Inc.) is now
producing about three dozen units per month, primarily for large industrial
batteries in warehouse handling equipment such as forklifts, etc. Systems will
shortly be available for battery powered golf carts etc., and then for electric
battery-powered automobiles.
SOLUTION SUMMARY
STATEMENT
In summary:
This required new and dramatic solution
to the entire energy/fuel/pollution problem is available for finishing in short
order, and it is urgently required.
The solution does require a dramatic
"paradigm shift" in our outlook on energy and energy sources.
It directly requires a major correction to the sadly
flawed and horribly crippled electrical engineering.
Because of the severe worldwide urgency,
this energy solution must be developed
in a "
References:
[1]. Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 4-2
[2]. R. L. Lehrman, “Energy is not the ability to do work,” Physics Teacher, Vol. 15, 1973, p. 15.
[3]. T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 181.
[4]. Tom Van Flandern, “The speed of gravity¾What
the experiments say,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 250,
[5]. The dipole is a proven broken symmetry; the source charge plus its surrounding polarized vacuum is also a proven broken symmetry. Hence a source charge or a source dipole freely absorbs virtual energy, coherently integrates it to observable size, then re-emits the energy as real, observable photons¾real EM energy flow that continually creates and replenishes the associated "static" EM fields and potentials.
[6]. E.g., see Nobelist Steven Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory, Vintage Books, Random House, 1993, p. 109-110.
[7]. R. P. Feynman and S. Weinberg, Elementary
Particles and the Laws of Physics,
[8]. H. A. Lorentz, "La Théorie
électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants," [The
Electromagnetic Theory of Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch.
Néerl. Sci., Vol. 25, 1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected
Papers,
[9]. For the full story with reference citations,
see the vivid article by Les Pastor and Tom Bearden, The Deliberate Curtailment
of Nikola Tesla's Primary Energy Source, available at link
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Deliberate_Curtailment_of_Nikola_Tesla%27s_Primary_
Energy_Source.
[10]. Nikola Tesla, in a speech in
[11]. Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897
commemorating his installation of generators at
[12]. Nikola Tesla, 1900.
[13]. Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.
[14]. T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41.
[15]. Lorentz also arbitrarily discarded the
stupendous nondiverged Heaviside curled energy flow component that pours from
the generator terminals in addition to the tiny diverged Poynting component.
See H. A. Lorentz, Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik an der Universität
[16]. This is the year that the frightened physics community leadership forcibly removed negative vacuum energy (and its negative probabilities) from the Dirac electron theory. As we address, this removed the ability of physics to directly engineer physical reality itself. For the complete story, see D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20.; Part II, New Energy, Issue 44, 2002, pp. 1-24.
[17]. M. W. Evans et al., , "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.
[18]. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237.
[19]. See (a) Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?" Am. J. Phys. 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327; (b) H. Paul and R. Fischer, {Comment on “How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?’},” Am. J. Phys., 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 327; (c) V. S. Letokhov, “Generation of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., Vol. 53, 1967, p. 1442; (d) V.S. Letokhov, “Generation of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption,” Sov. Phys. JETP, 26(4), Apr. 1968, p. 835-839: (e) V. S. Letokhov, “Stimulated emission of an ensemble of scattering particles with negative absorption,” ZhETF Plasma, 5(8), Apr. 15, 1967, p. 262-265; (f) V. S. Letokhov, “Double g and optical resonance,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 43, 1973, p. 179-180; (g) Alekseev, A. V.; Zinin, Yu. A.; Sushilov, N. V. “Effect of negative resonance absorption in a weak polychromatic field,” Optics and Spectroscopy, Volume 69, Issue 6, December 1990, pp.736-739; (h) V. S. Letokhov, “Laser Maxwell’s Demon,” Contemporary Physics, 36(4), 1995, p. 235-243.
[20]. This is apparently the method used (unwittingly) by Kanzius for his independently proven and validated watergas process and his cancer cure process. The very best process, particularly for curing diseases, is apparently the experimental Bedini/Soviet process of tickling the local vacuum with stress potential precursors rather than force field precursors. Bedini does this by having a short positive pulse on a very specific component such as a coil, followed immediately by a short negative pulse on that same coil. If everything is adjusted just exactly right, no current flows in the coil during the two pulse duration, and with a "froth" of such carefully obtained stress pulses, the vacuum will have had introduced to it a "froth" of stress precursors, not force precursors. These can and will stimulate a living system completely, from all elements of its genetics and cells, etc. on up to all physical parts and sizes. The result is to "shake loose" most all the accumulated bad stuff, and set the body to something resembling "full healing". The Scenar® device allowed by the Russians to be sold in the West uses just a tiny bit of this "stress frothing" of the local vacuum. So it produces results, but not nearly as good as the highest level Soviet communist officials and their families, and KGB officials and their families, receive. The reader is cautioned never to perform such actions himself; this information is intended for advanced research only, not for casual experimentation.
[21]. Michael O’Mara, “
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=74285&GID=zk4SwIKSnGIds9hUfynnp+AmKjjOke5Fp+37lHLYo9Q%3D. Includes a video clip as well. “This is the biggest discovery in 100 years in water research!” said Professor Emeritus Rustum Roy, at the Penn State University Materials Lab, who is a leading expert on the science of water. Dr. Roy tested the Kanzius watergas process rigorously.
PSU research associate, Tania Slawecki
said, "I think this is an excellent
breakthrough. The steam engine wasn't invented because thermodynamics existed.
The steam engine was invented and then thermodynamics came along. We've got
lots more to discover about this invention, too."
[22]. Steven M. Sweeny, “Kanzius sees success:
http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071031/NEWS02/710310441/-1/NEWS.
[23]. (a) Dan Solomon, "Some new results
concerning the vacuum in Dirac’s hole theory," Physica Scripta,
Vol. 74, 2006, p. 117–122; (b) Dan Solomon. “Some differences between Dirac's
hole theory and quantum field theory.”
[24]. The letter from the National Science Foundation, showing that the errors paper passed NSF review, is given at http://www.cheniere.org/references/NSF%20letter%20Bearden.jpg.
[25]. For the 30+ page paper that details the many serious falsities in the CEM/EE model, see T. E. Bearden, “Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model,” available at http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/CEM%20Errors%20-%20final%20paper%20complete%20w%20longer%20abstract4.doc.
[26]. See Herb Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously
Souped Up." NewScientist,
[27]. For further information see (a) Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and Victor I. Klimov; "High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct photogeneration of multi-excitons via virtual single-exciton states." Nature Physics Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 189-194. See also (b) Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A. Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect of electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency: Comparative study of PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 87, 2005, 253102.