The Clash of Disclosure
Worldviews
by Glenn
Gould 
Posted:
|
Invasion earth or
peaceful explorers? |
One problematic issue regarding the abandonment of secrecy
surrounding extraterrestrial influence on our planet is the post-disclosure
worldview. While that subject is on the minds of those who keep secrets secret,
it seems to have evaded, for the most part, the thoughts of the more militant
members of the groups that demand full disclosure at any price. The
post-disclosure world, as seen through the eyes of our governments, is one of
unimaginable horror wherein their historic hold on human civilization has
ended. Those who insist on full disclosure seem to disregard
the ramifications of a world after disclosure, and what that world will mean to
them personally. This condition prohibits meaningful dialog between the two
viewpoints, thus preventing any consensus on the subject.
Though the younger generation may disagree, full disclosure of
persistent extraterrestrial interaction with earth is not going to be at all
comparable to Steve Jobs or Bill Gates introducing some great new invention or
innovation. Some will applaud and cheer, no doubt, but many more will not.
Regardless of the method – be it CNN with bold new graphics, or some
commandeering of communications by the visitors or their partners – these
events will be traumatic for all humans. Panic and joy, blank stares and happy
faces, and sanctuaries filled with penitent believers will sweep the planet.
Full disclosure will be difficult on humanity, due not only to its iconoclast
nature, but due mainly to the inevitable collateral cultural damage.
While a massive technological bestowal will positively affect
energy and the environment, as well as the human condition in general, that
change will also reach into every individual´s life
on a personal level. Each "revolution" has been the result of the
change of the predominate worldview of the people of earth, from the mercantile
and scientific revolutions through the industrial and the technological, or
computer revolutions. The revolution that will follow full disclosure will
dwarf all previous epochs. It will be "the end of the world as we know
it".
Our governments are chronically aware of this potentially
catastrophic shift in our understanding and have consistently acted to prevent
it. The power elite have long envisioned this future and want no part of it.
The average person, bathed in the media controlled debunking of everything,
will not be able to digest it. The typical Disclosure Activist seems to have
overlooked what the inevitable change will mean to them on a personal level.
Disclosure will be anything but business as usual for planet earth.
The release of this information depends on at least two factors of
great significance. First, human races need to come to a mutually shared vision
of a future unlike any we have seen in recorded history. This worldview
transcends nations, cultures and politics. It is a worldview of cosmic
proportions. To obtain to our place in the galactic neighborhood requires us to
first lay aside our petty selfishness and base desires. Our historic behavior
prohibits our inclusion. Secondly, but of primary import, we will have to
forgive, unreservedly, those who have, by acts of omission and commission, kept
the veil of secrecy in place regarding extraterrestrial intervention and
association these last three generations. An amnesty for this behavior will be
required before significant information is released on any official level.
These seemingly impossible prerequisites must be dealt with prior to full
disclosure.
Essentially, something on the order of World Peace must precede
Full Disclosure.
Unprecedented change will follow an unimpeded, unmitigated release
of decades of unbelievable information. A change this profound, the redirection
of "normal" human evolution, has happened in only our oldest memories
– those recounted in the Genesis texts and the Sumerian and Akkadian
texts of five to seven millennia past. Those writings declare that the
trajectory of human evolution was adjusted. Interestingly, these
"corrections" all included traumatic reductions in human population.
Objectively speaking, this reduction in variables (us) increases homogeneity
and simplifies the acceptance of new realities. In the absence of such a
unifying and traumatic preparatory process of some kind, new ideas and
paradigms simply add to the overabundance of ideas that lead to further
cultural, religious and nationalistic divides. These divisions keep our species
at a low level of sociological development while still allowing sporadic
advances in technology. Poor social combined with strong technical skills lead
to the world we have today.
In an interview with Linda Howe, Jim Sparks, a long time subject
of ET interest, was asked about any information concerning the future of
mankind he may have gained in connection with his ET encounters. An interesting
observation Mr. Sparks makes is that in both of his alternative visions of
potential human futures, one of a "gloomy and fascist" land of
darkness, and one of "bright and clean" utopian community, he sees,
or senses, only small numbers of people. These divergent paths were presented
to him as two alternatives we have to select from as a species. Interesting is
the fact that in both alternatives, the numbers of humans involved seems to be
far less than presently inhabit the planet.
Human efforts designed to produce utopian societies have
ordinarily included some form of genocide. The Persecutions, Inquisitions,
Pogroms, the New World, witch-hunts, the American civil war, Hitler and the
master race, Paul Pot and the Khmer Rouge, the tribal terror in Africa – all
these forms and many others, include the reduction of variables in the human
equation. These actions are even deemed noble and beneficial for the betterment
of society by those engaged in them. This form of thinking seems to be
consistent throughout the ancient texts, our history and the visions of our
future. The problem seems to be genetic – we have a propensity for this form of
behavior.
More than our violent and belligerent traits, we humans have an
even more deeply engrained predisposition toward faith. This aspect of our
psychologies forms the basis of all our civilizations, and underlies all our
financial and monetary institutions. Not even an atheist could deny that the
god of this age is money. The financial and monetary systems of all civilized
nations today have evolved into strictly faith-based fiat currencies. The
concepts of a fractional banking system have reached their absolute limit, and
now a quantity of nothing can have an infinite value. Based on the "good
faith and confidence" in government and financial institutions, our money
today is in reality worth only the materials which constitute it. Without even
the semi-rational tangibility of gold to back it, we struggle our entire lives
in a quest for more of something that has no real intrinsic value. The world
religion of money has its own temples, its priest and prophet classes, its
angels and demons. This religion has proselytized every nation on earth. While
the denominations may vary, the doctrine is consistent. You cannot survive
without money. People of the world can do fine without God, but money is the
lifeblood of all that calls itself civilized.
All wars are resultant from the struggle for power. Power in this
world is the control of energy and finance. And since our faith is
predominately in finance, the planned collapse of the world economy would be
the decisive battle in a war against our very basest beliefs. The social
upheaval and chaos would lead to anarchy and violence. The elite would loose
all control of governance and this would open the door for an alternative
worldview. The remaining people of earth, immobilized by the catastrophe of
global financial collapse, would gladly accept any assistance, from any source.
And from the debris of the ruins of our world religion would arise
a phoenix of extraterrestrial origin.
Had our species been allowed to naturally evolve, and to
simultaneously develop social structures that enhance technological discovery,
had we been allowed to mature as a race with a real understanding of community,
things would be entirely different. We would eventually have been in a position
to take our place in a community that transcends our space and time, and could
accept life in the cosmos for what it is. Sadly, this was not the case. Full
disclosure of extraterrestrial intervention will be a revelation of biblical
proportion, with all that implies.
Incorporating that spiritual dimension, some proponents of
disclosure seem to have more of a mystical perspective on the world after
disclosure. In the last four decades, the popularity of transcendental and
metaphysical concepts has increased to surpass the level of the early 19th
century, and parallels the vision and work of Madam H. P. Blatavasky.
Theirs is a post-disclosure world of intimate association with Ascended
Masters who assist mankind to achieve its true potential, and rise to the
level of its Teachers. In essence, technological benefits, offered by the
visitors, would allow man to realize his destiny, by alleviating much of the
necessity of continually struggling for physical needs. Militant disclosure advocates seem to fail to create a mental
image of a world during and after disclosure, and to act upon this image in a
substantive manner, unlike their adversaries, whose actions indicate an
intimate awareness of what the process of disclosure will bring. The view of
many disclosure proponents is simple – human problems of energy, food and
health are mitigated and ameliorated, and we seem to continue being who we
were, with perhaps a new set of friends in our cell phones, and possibly a
few new reality shows on DTV. This group sees disclosure as simply another
area onto which the pervasive concepts of contemporary human civilization,
concepts such as trade and politics, or exopolitics,
can be overlaid and perfected. We know so very little of the actual mindset and motivations of
these xenophiles who visit our beautiful planet. Are they merchants,
mercenaries or missionaries? Do they share the multifaceted dreams and
nightmares of our species? Are they homogenous or are they variegated in
character, in sentiment? Are they really interested in us as individuals or
are we some kind of resource or commodity? We will inevitably find out just what is in store for us. Or,
perhaps, what we are in the store for. In any event, some of us are aware
that our perceptions and beliefs, founded on the
accumulation of wealth and the care and feeding of number one, are
insufficient and immature at best, and that any future which includes mankind
as a member of some far-reaching intergalactic federation is a distant
vision. We greet the visitors today with at least four general paradigms;
that they are the enemy, they are our benefactors, they are our gods or they
are not there at all. Two things are consistent about the nature of this reality that
seems to surround us. The universe is stochastic and fractal. Having noted
this, one might be horrified to find that our visitors are nothing more than
concentrated versions of ourselves, various groups having
"discovered" earth, each with its own paradigm and moral
inclinations. Are we simply like those East Indian natives in 1492, happily
and idyllically frolicking naked in the surf and noticing those strange white
sails coming over the horizon? |